Interview with Kumiko Aoki
“There's no need to memorise facts, just the skill to gather information”
April 2009
/ By Toshiko Sakurai
Kumiko Aoki has lived in the United States for 17 years, obtaining her Master’s Degree in
Communication at the University of Winsconsin and her Ph.D in Communication and Information
Sciences from the University of Hawaii. From 1995 to 1998 Aoki was Assistant Professor at Rochester
Institute of Technology in New York and Assistant Professor at Boston University from 1998 to 2003,
after which she went back to Japan to take up her current position in the National Institute of
Multimedia Education, a quasi-governmental research organization to research and promote e-learning
in higher education.
What’s the current state of e-learning in Japan?
When I went back to Japan, while my main job was to do research, I started teaching at the
Graduate University for Advanced Studies. I was amazed by the differences in learning style between
Japanese and American students. Japanese students are, in a sense, very traditional. They’re
accustomed to the lecture style of teaching and learning, so, even at university they still expect
teachers to lecture, while they sit and take notes and that’s the whole purpose of the
teaching courses. I really want to change that, into a more project-based learning, a more
student-centered learning.
...learning through collaborative content?
Yes, the way to introduce it is through collaboration with students in another country, in
another university and to help my students in my university collaborate in some area of research. I
want my students to experience a more active learning. So that’s my whole motivation for this
kind of project. Learning by discussing research, learning by gathering and sharing information,
communicating what they find... That sort of thing. It’s pretty common in the United States
as well as in Western countries, but it’s not very common in Japan, where it’s more
lecture-based.
How do you plan on bringing this collaborative style to Japan?
Well, I’m so impressed here, everything you do here is really active learning, the
student is the center of the whole learning system, and you create environments for students to get
engaged in learning, so I think that should be the way to go in the future. One thing is to change
the assessment method, because it’s just multiple choice exams where students only focus on
memorizing facts. It’s very commonly done, for example in university entrance exams, but
that’s not what current society is demanding. You can search for facts on the Internet very
quickly, you don’t have to memorize them. What’s needed is the skill to gather and
comment on information in a meaningful way for others. That’s a more important skill and I
think if students aren’t given the opportunity to do this, our role as educators is to grant
opportunities to do so, to get better at doing so.
What’s the purpose of your current visit?
This is a tour to visit different open universities. Before coming here I had already visited
two open universities. One in Germany, which was quite a traditional distance education
institution, no comparison with this one [UOC]. Also, I headed to the Open University of the
Netherlands and tomorrow we’ll be going to UNED and the last one we’ll be going to is
the Hellenic Open University in Greece. The whole purpose is to find out about the educational
model of an open university. We want to transform the Open University of Japan into a more
Internet-based institution, broadcasting lectures, creating interactive learning. I’d like to
see which model will work in our context. We’ve seen many different models and there are
different stages of development. We can’t be like you overnight but we can aspire to provide
more student-centered and active learning and I think your institution has a really good
perspective on the new educational model.
Well, at least there must be something from your experience you could bring to the
UOC?
Tough question! I could think of many, many ways to improve open education in Japan, but I
think you’ve done pretty well. There are innovative research institutions, but the innovative
research is not really connected to practice, but here I see actual research being implemented into
the practice and that’s a very good model. It must be difficult for already established
institutions but you have the advantage of being newer. From the very beginning you’ve had
that vision of an innovative model. I hope in the near future we can be as innovative.
How do you see the future of distance learning in terms of globalization?
Right now, I’m very envious of Europe, with the beginning of this interlaced system of
education. I know there are many issues to be solved, but I think it’s a really good
movement, because students have the freedom to go anywhere they want to study without being stuck
in a certain country. They can pick the courses they want and the places they want to be in. In
that sense in Asia, and in Japan, we’re very behind. Although it may be physically difficult,
we can start virtually, and virtual mobility and collaboration between students is what I’d
like to promote as the starting point in a global educational market.
- Associate Professor at Japan’s National Institute of Multimedia Education
- Master’s Degree in Communication at the University of Winsconsin
- Ph.D in Communication and Information Sciences from the University of Hawaii
- Assistant Professor at Rochester Institute of Technology (1995-1998)
- Assistant Professor at Boston University (1998-2003)